Viewing ofReference Material
Art students and others conducting research are welcome to make an appointment with us to view the works listed in the adjacent table.
It is also recommended for Europeans to use the online search system at KVK (Karlsruher Virtueller Katalog), in which all German and many European scholarly libraries list their available references. Sometimes the works are available for loan.
A list of further references about Australian art, which however are not yet in our reference collection, is also maintained and continually extended.
Literature in our Collection
(M-Z)
Myers, Fred: "Disturbances in the field: Exhibiting Aboriginal art in the US", Journal of Sociology 49 (2-3) 2013, S. 151-172, DOI:10.1177/1440783313481520
Table of Contents ¦ Cover Text ¦ Review⁄Abstract
Table of Contents
Abstract -151-
Introduction -151-
The time and space of art worlds, the differences among objects -153-
Differentiating objects -155-
From classification to practice -155-
A frame of the exhibition: a new kind of beauty is born -157-
The structure of the field, partly: You can take the art out of the bush, but you cant take the bush out of the art! -158-
The structure of the discursive field -161-
Icons of the Desert -162-
The catalog -164-
On the bus: symposium and Ithaca -165-
The opening, New York, and national value -165-
Restricting the formalist narrative -167-
Friction: a collectors journey of understanding -168-
Conclusion: the vicissitudes of bush capital -169-
Notes -171-
References -171-
Biographical note -172-
Review⁄Abstract
Abstract: This article considers the role of varied agents in the circulation of Papunya art across the relations between the Australian and the international art fields. My analysis follows an exhibition that took place at New York Universitys Grey Gallery in 2009, tracing in particular the international circulation of the highly valued early Papunya boards. By focusing on the unsettled nature of Aboriginal arts circulation and the problem of producing ist value socially in a world that is not consolidated, I consider Bourdieus field of cultural production as still becoming. Finally, my argument should caution against assuming that antipodean fields might be addressed as autonomous from international agents, circuits of distribution and so on. It also questions Bourdieus tendency to treat national art fields as independent.